Are you though? You last commit was 28 days ago and you’ve indicated in DMs that you are “not actively working on clrfund anymore” and “I don’t work on new features”.
If you are maintaining the repo, then we need to re-establish communication because it’s been short or non-existent for the last month.
I agree. You’ve been the primary driving force behind clrfund for the last year. But we now have new contributors looking to join, which should hopefully spread some of the burden that you’ve been carrying solo.
I’d really like to ensure that these new contributors feel comfortable and empowered to make suggestions and contributions. Especially if you are no longer actively working on clrfund.
I wholeheartedly disagree. Yes, I think that people with a proven contribution history should have more of a say, but just because someone has not yet contributed does not mean their opinion is not valuable.
You’ve chosen not to participate in this, even though you’ve been part of the telegram group where the vast majority of that discussion happened. From day 1, one of the goals of this work was to merge changes back upstream. It is not a separate project.
That’s fair. At this point it will probably be a significant effort to merge the changes. Nevertheless, I think it’s a worthwhile effort. I’d suggest that perhaps this is something that Matias can take on. Merging into a new branch in clrfund/monorepo and once the styling and functionality is inline with what we can for the canonical instance, then merging it to develop.
Also fair. They’ve gone ahead and implemented it on the ETH2 fork for the time being.